Posterous
Scott is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Talisman_light_thumb
 

SwBratcher’s Posts

swbratcher.com

« Back to blog

Textile Markup now compatible with Posterous

EDIT: Nope. Didn't work. False alarm everybody. The day I'm able to send this email and it shows up in the browser as proper HTML, I'll click my heals. (Work for Posterous or use Posterous? See the post comments for more details...). I originally thought Textile had been implemented when the last Get Satisfaction post that said "Textile!" was submitted. This was my enthusiastic, evangelistic shout out for Posterous.

Finally, you can reliably format the resulting HTML markup from a plain text email by using a few simple syntax rules in your Posterous post.

All of this HTML was spit out using the plain-text markup illustrated at these links: "for paragraphs (Examples of paragraph formatting...)":http://redcloth.org/textile/writing-paragraph-text/ here "for layout (Examples of layout formatting like bullets and blockquotes...)":http://redcloth.org/textile/page-layout/ and here "for text modifiers (Examples of text modifiers like html link formatting...)":http://redcloth.org/textile/phrase-modifiers/.

This is better because:

* All too often I had to go edit a post to fix formatting after submitting it by email.
* This allows precision formatting from a plain-text email like would come from an iphone or blackberry.
* You don't have to learn or edit HTML with the Posterous post editor.

I've been waiting for this for some time, but I commend the Posterous team on their speed and eventual release of the the addition of this feature. Thanks guys, for always improving.

Here's the ongoing dialogue with Posterous about this feature: "Get Satisfaction Thread (View comments by others about this topic...)":http://getsatisfaction.com/posterous/topics/markdown_or_another_simple_markup_in_posterous

Loading mentions Retweet
// Posted February 4, 2010
Feb 04, 2010
Scott Bratcher said...
Nope. Didn't work. False alarm everybody. The day I'm able to send this email and it shows up in the browser as proper HTML, I'll click my heals.

Really, though, I would like more of a dialogue from the Posterous guys about why this isn't able to be implemented. It's clean, easy to use, very simple to add to an application, and would save more resources than it would consume.

Here is what you guys need to consider:

* Let us indicate in the subject whether to process with textile or not by starting the subject with an asterisk.
* Processing my post with textile prior to posting will use less server process than my current work flow.

My current workflow is as follows:
# submit post
# load post to check formatting
# if post html formatting is foul, continue, else done
# log in if not already
# click to edit post
# click to edit html of post
# save edited post html
# go to step 2

Please rescue us. I cannot be the only one wasting your resources like this when textile is such a simple implementation.

Feb 05, 2010
Michael Lynton said...
what made you think this was working? you got my hopes up dude.
Feb 05, 2010
Scott Bratcher said...
I felt the same way when it didn't work. I read the "Textile!" post here http://getsatisfaction.com/posterous/topics/markdown_or_another_simple_markup_in_posterous and misunderstood it as a proclamation that textile had been implemented. Since I've communicated in that get satisfaction dialogue, new comments arrive in my email inbox. This further obscured the context of the 'Textile!' post.

I was blinded by optimism. As a test I posted the sharing of this news.

When the test didn't work, I was bummed and updated the post with an edit and elaborated on the need for it in my comment. Sorry about continuing the false alarm. Let the guys over at Posterous know you would benefit and maybe we can get a bump in priority.

Feb 19, 2010
Hiram said...
Sorry about the confusion I caused by shouting "Textile!" on the Get Satisfaction forum. I merely meant to express a wish...
 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    twitter